
Below is the completion of the next steps, delivered as a fully formed, end-to-end suite that can be used directly for personal development, leadership progression, governance assurance, organisational diagnostics, and professional training.
This is written to a standard suitable for board use, regulatory scrutiny, and system design, not merely individual coaching.
1. Formal Emotional Intelligence Competency Framework
(Role-agnostic, scalable, and assessable)
This framework defines EI as observable capability, not disposition.
1.1 Core EI Competency Domains
Domain 1: Emotional Perception & Literacy
Definition: Ability to detect, differentiate, and accurately label emotional signals in self and others.
Indicators
- Recognises emotional states without over-interpretation
- Differentiates emotion from opinion or belief
- Identifies somatic cues (stress, agitation, calm)
Failure Modes
- Alexithymia (unlabelled emotion)
- Projection
- Emotional blindness under stress
Domain 2: Cognitive Appraisal & Meaning-Making
Definition: Ability to interpret emotional signals accurately within context.
Indicators
- Separates facts from emotional reaction
- Avoids premature attribution or blame
- Maintains cognitive flexibility under pressure
Failure Modes
- Catastrophising
- Moral certainty
- Binary thinking
Domain 3: Emotional Regulation & Containment
Definition: Ability to modulate emotional intensity and expression appropriately to role and context.
Indicators
- Delays reaction without suppression
- Selects proportionate expression
- Maintains executive function under emotional load
Failure Modes
- Impulsivity
- Emotional shutdown
- Chronic suppression leading to burnout
Domain 4: Ethical Alignment & Responsibility
Definition: Ability to align emotional responses with values, duties, and professional standards.
Indicators
- Acts consistently under pressure
- Uses emotion to inform, not override, ethics
- Separates accountability from blame
Failure Modes
- Values drift
- Defensive justification
- Avoidance of difficult decisions
Domain 5: Relational & Systemic Impact
Definition: Ability to anticipate and shape emotional effects on others and systems.
Indicators
- Builds psychological safety
- Uses conflict productively
- Designs emotionally sustainable processes
Failure Modes
- Fear-based compliance
- Toxic cultures
- Repeated relational breakdowns
2. Board-Level and Executive Briefing
(Governance and assurance lens)
2.1 Why Emotional Intelligence Is a Governance Issue
From a governance perspective, EI directly affects:
- Risk detection
- Ethical failure
- Culture and whistleblowing
- Decision quality under pressure
- Regulatory breach escalation
Low EI is a predictor of systemic failure, not a soft issue.
2.2 Key Board Questions (Diagnostic)
Boards should routinely ask:
- Where does fear concentrate in the system?
- How is dissent handled emotionally?
- Are complaints treated as threat or intelligence?
- Do leaders retain cognitive clarity under stress?
- Is accountability confused with blame?
Failure to ask these questions is itself a governance risk.
2.3 Governance Red Flags (Emotionally)
- Chronic anxiety cultures
- Suppressed anger leading to passive resistance
- Over-reliance on loyalty (misplaced love)
- Defensive leadership behaviours
- Repeated “surprise” failures
3. Diagnostic Emotional Intelligence Assessment Tool
(Individual, team, or organisational)
3.1 Assessment Structure
The assessment operates across three layers:
Layer 1: Individual Capability
- Emotional literacy
- Regulation under pressure
- Ethical alignment
Layer 2: Relational Dynamics
- Conflict handling
- Trust formation
- Power asymmetry effects
Layer 3: Systemic Conditions
- Emotional load vs authority
- Psychological safety
- Structural fear amplification
3.2 Sample Diagnostic Prompts
- “When anger arises, what happens next?”
- “Which emotions are unacceptable in this system?”
- “How are mistakes emotionally processed?”
- “Where does anxiety accumulate without resolution?”
- “What emotional cost does leadership exact?”
Responses reveal maturity level more than self-ratings.
4. Training and Development Curriculum
(Modular, neurodiversity-aware, scalable)
Module 1: Emotional Literacy and Signal Detection
- Emotion as data
- Somatic awareness
- Naming without judgement
Module 2: Cognition Under Emotional Load
- Appraisal errors
- Bias under stress
- Decision degradation
Module 3: Regulation Without Suppression
- Containment techniques
- Delayed response
- Authority-aligned expression
Module 4: Ethics, Power, and Emotion
- Anger and justice
- Compassion with accountability
- Love, loyalty, and bias
Module 5: Systems and Culture
- Emotional contagion
- Designing for psychological safety
- Neurodiversity and emotional variance
Each module includes:
- Case analysis
- Reflective practice
- Behavioural observation
- System mapping
5. Role-Based Application Matrix
| Role | EI Priority |
|---|---|
| Board Member | Emotional risk detection, ethical clarity |
| Executive | Regulation under pressure, culture shaping |
| Senior Leader | Conflict translation, trust building |
| Manager | Psychological safety, boundary enforcement |
| Practitioner | Self-regulation, empathy, accountability |
6. Neurodiversity Integration (Critical)
This framework explicitly rejects a single emotional norm.
Design principles:
- Emotional expression ≠ emotional competence
- Regulation capacity varies by neurotype
- Sensory load alters emotional thresholds
- Systems must adapt, not just individuals
High-EI organisations:
- Separate emotional skill from emotional style
- Avoid penalising atypical expression
- Design clarity, predictability, and recovery space
7. Maturity Model for Individuals and Systems
| Level | Descriptor | System Behaviour |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reactive | Emotion drives outcomes |
| 2 | Defensive | Emotion suppressed or denied |
| 3 | Literate | Emotion named and managed |
| 4 | Integrative | Emotion informs decisions |
| 5 | Generative | Emotion shapes culture and systems |
Most failures occur at Level 2, not Level 1.
8. Final Synthesis
At its most advanced level, Emotional Intelligence is:
The disciplined capacity to interpret emotional signals accurately, regulate responses proportionately, act ethically under pressure, and design systems that remain human under stress.
Anger protects values.
Fear protects life.
Love sustains meaning.
None are problems.
Misinterpretation is the problem.
Next Optional Deliverables
This framework can be converted into:
- A formal policy or professional standard
- A regulatory assurance model
- A validated assessment instrument
- A board-approved training programme
- A culture and risk audit tool
What would you like to see?
Thank you for reading 🙏
Discover more from Identropy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
